If we have to play by the PLCB rules...could we at least get a
better set of players?
Back in 2015 in the
Annual Report (page 2), the
vision of the PLCB was stated as:
"Be recognized as the best-in-class wine and spirits retailer, distributor and regulator in the United States."
Which meant that they wanted to be
better than Utah, the
only other wine and spirits
retailer, distributor, and regulator in the United States.
Not a high bar, considering
Utah is practically an
anti-alcohol theocracy. Four years later, how are they doing? Let's start at the top and go from there.
The Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board has
three members, none of which over the past 85 years has any previous knowledge of the liquor industry or about running a
2 billion dollar enterprise.
We have a
Chairman who has no experience with even a
million dollar business, let along something the
size of the PLCB. He did make it to Congress, and served on the
Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry subcommittee, and
Transportation and Infrastructure committee, before the
citizens decided that he
wasn't doing the job they wanted and
voted him out. Since there isn't
much call for somebody who's
chummy with with politicians, and knows
a little about Livestock, Dairy & Poultry, the PLCB was a
perfect place to put somebody who was
owed a couple of favors.
Governor Corbett appointed Republican benefactor
Mike Negra to the board. Mr. Negra does have a history of being involved in
multiple successful businesses, so at least he has a
concept of what is going on, but no actual hands on with the
liquor business, or anything the
size of the PLCB.
Lastly we have the
newest member and
first woman ever to serve on the board,
Mary Isenhour.
Although you wouldn't know it by looking at the PLCB website. Here it is,
over a MONTH after her confirmation, and the PLCB
still hasn't decided if she
rates being included with the other board members. (Let's see how long it takes for them to include her once this is published.)*
Keeping the public informed through transparency is sadly not the way the PLCB works. Remember that it took
over 100 days before they
removed Michael Newsome, and that was only after I
poked them with a stick again. Newsome
might still be there if I hadn't said anything.
What are Isenhour's qualifications? She was
Gov. Wolf's Chief of Staff and a
campaign aide. Her business experience is
like the others,
desperately lacking in knowledge and size. She replaced Michael Newsome, who was
Gov. Wolf's CFO in the furniture business -- can't get more qualified to sell liquor than that...
or can we?
Remember how we were
comparing the PLCB to
Utah's State Store System of Stores? So how does the
Utah DABC stack up? They have a seven member board that's appointed, but there is also an
advisory board of seven members...
who must come from defined specific areas of expertise. The Governor can't just
willy nilly pick his favorite dog walker to sit on the
Advisory Board. Utah
specifies that the
advisory board members are selected from the following areas of expertise.
Retail Alcohol Industry — Wholesaler Industry — Manufacturing Industry —
Restaurant Industry — Utah
Substance Use and Mental Health Advisory Council —
Alcohol or Drug Related Enforcement — Division of
Substance Abuse and Mental Health —
Alcohol or Drug Abuse Prevention and Education
|
The Utah version of a Superstore |
|
Another view. Pretty nice, right? |
It is
almost certain that since this
system was adopted
every Utah DABC Advisory member is
far more qualified than
any that have ever been appointed to the
PLCB. This doesn't mean that Utah hasn't had their share of people of
limited competence on the Liquor Board. The
Governor selects the seven members of the Liquor Board, so it can be and likely is as
full of hacks and cronies as Pennsylvania. The difference is that
the Utah board can't go
off the rails making
arbitrary decisions without an
adult from the Advisory Board watching them. No deciding that
12 packs are cases, no
robot wine armies, no
variably price screwing the citizens, and no being
over a Billion in debt. Oh, and they have had
women on the Boards for years already.
End the PLCB jobs program -
PRIVATIZE
*True to form it only took the PLCB 42 days to finally put up a picture. Not quite as bad as the 102 days it took to take down the board member she replaced.